On Thu Feb 07 22:11:16 2013, demerphq wrote: > On 7 February 2013 00:58, Ricardo Signes <perl.p5p@rjbs.manxome.org> wrote: > > * demerphq <demerphq@gmail.com> [2013-02-06T03:54:55] > >> On 6 February 2013 08:44, <hv@crypt.org> wrote: > >> > Allowing it with a warning only makes sense to me if we want to be able > >> > to define the effect in terms of something else, like '(?#comment) is > >> > the same as (?=(?:|comment))'; but it isn't, and we don't. :) > >> > >> Thanks for the analysis, I agree. If I can figure it out at all I will > >> make it die instead of warn. > > > > Agreed, too, thanks Hugo. > > A patch to implement this has been pushed as: > smoke-me/regex_comment_quantifier_fix Did this change smoke cleanly for you? I don't see anything at http://perl.develop-help.com/?b=smoke-me%2Fregex_comment_quantifier_fix that looks like it was caused by this patch. This branch no longer rebases cleanly on blead. Tony --- via perlbug: queue: perl5 status: open https://rt.perl.org:443/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=116639Thread Next