Front page | perl.perl5.porters |
Postings from July 2013
On 6 July 2013 21:38, Ricardo Signes <perl.p5p@rjbs.manxome.org> wrote: > * Father Chrysostomos via RT <perlbug-followup@perl.org> [2013-06-30T10:03:06] >> > > It’s just a matter of tweaking the defer logic in pp_aelem. Then rvalue >> > > uses of $_[0] within the function will just work, but assignment to >> > > $_[0] will croak with the same error (i.e., the error will be delayed as >> > > long as possible). >> > > >> > >> > Do we really want to do that? >> >> I say Yes! :-) > > I think so. (I am speaking here only as a user. So, probably: apply unless > somebody has a great objection... which probably should've happened by now?) If it means that $array[-1] will not die in when used as an rvalue on an empty @array then personally I am in favor. cheers, Yves -- perl -Mre=debug -e "/just|another|perl|hacker/"Thread Previous | Thread Next