Front page | perl.perl5.porters |
Postings from July 2013
[Since insomnia is kicking my ass]
On Wed, Jul 3, 2013 at 2:02 AM, Kent Fredric <kentfredric@gmail.com> wrote:
> 1. If $foo is a bless, $foo->list would invoke (blessed $object)->list, not
> ARRAY->list , which meant you'd have to use a different syntax if you were
> inside a class definition.
Ugly option: do it with an upper case method, since those are
reserved. But, frankly, I'd hate that, since my capslock is now a
control key and the uc typing overhead would annoy me more than
circumfix does.
> 2. ->@ could be imagined to be easily overloaded for, so bless()'d objects
> that *arent* arrays could still implement list deref overloads, so that
> they'd still work as arrays with things that need them to.
Assuming that it's implemented such that the resulting optree is an
ordinary array deref op, then the existing "@{}" overloading will
still work as it does now.
David
--
David Golden <xdg@xdg.me>
Take back your inbox! → http://www.bunchmail.com/
Twitter/IRC: @xdg
Thread Previous
|
Thread Next