On Wed Jun 26 16:32:27 2013, perl.p5p@rjbs.manxome.org wrote: > * Father Chrysostomos via RT <perlbug-followup@perl.org> [2013-06- > 17T09:33:08] > > I would like to see that *un*deprecated. I see no reason why that > > syntax should cause any problems. It doesnβt make anything less > > ambiguous to remove it. (On top of that, it looks nice!) > > I slept on this for a few nights, because you may well be correct that > it > introduces no syntactical ambiguity, and because I do generally > believe that ππ > ππ’π π‘πππ’π πππ ππ π‘ πππ ππ’π‘ππππ’π... but no. I think it's just the sort of > facepalmingly "straightforward" syntax that has no real value but to > further > confuse the uninitiated. Thirty-two thousand eight hundred and nine > shibboleths are enough. We can do without restoring one more. In that case I have rerejected ticket #66686. -- Father Chrysostomos --- via perlbug: queue: perl5 status: open https://rt.perl.org:443/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=118511Thread Previous | Thread Next