On Thu, Jun 27, 2013 at 4:59 PM, Steffen Mueller <smueller@cpan.org> wrote: > On top of all of this, I think we need another state. "cpan, but author has > acknowledged that p5p reserve the right to apply bugfixes in blead and even > temporarily take ownership of the namespace via PAUSE in dire circumstances > to push fixes out if the author doesn't respond in a timely fashion or > doesn't manage to find time himself". I think in general it may help to explicitly separate maintainership from ownership. I'd greatly prefer core infrastructure to be owned by p5p, even if it's actively maintained by someone. LeonThread Previous | Thread Next