Front page | perl.perl5.porters |
Postings from June 2013
On Thu, Jun 27, 2013 at 12:26:16PM +0200, demerphq wrote: > > What you are suggesting is that we can only remove deprecated features > when you and some group of unnamed individuals have approved the > reason for removal. I never made such a claim. Please reread my parts of the thread and try to see my message for what it is. > I dont think that flies. I don't think so either ;) > Any such issues should be raised when the features is proposed for > deprecation. If the pumpking, who has final decision on the matter, > decides the item is deprecated then that should be sufficient. Agreed (nor ever contested) > Frankly if I encountered a sufficiently long deprecated feature in > part of the code I tend to work on and it got in my way in the > slightest bit I would chainsaw it without question or even discussion, > and would not expect any come back on it. Precisely! The whole point is that this is not the case wrt <<"". Thanks for loudly agreeing with me ;) CheersThread Previous | Thread Next