* Father Chrysostomos via RT <perlbug-followup@perl.org> [2013-06-17T09:33:08] > I would like to see that *un*deprecated. I see no reason why that > syntax should cause any problems. It doesnβt make anything less > ambiguous to remove it. (On top of that, it looks nice!) I slept on this for a few nights, because you may well be correct that it introduces no syntactical ambiguity, and because I do generally believe that ππ ππ’π π‘πππ’π πππ ππ π‘ πππ ππ’π‘ππππ’π... but no. I think it's just the sort of facepalmingly "straightforward" syntax that has no real value but to further confuse the uninitiated. Thirty-two thousand eight hundred and nine shibboleths are enough. We can do without restoring one more. -- rjbs (is your astral plane broken? "de gustibus non est disputandum")Thread Previous | Thread Next