On Sat Jun 22 16:24:09 2013, sprout wrote: > On Sat Jun 22 14:33:02 2013, nicholas wrote: > > > > > > Pushed as origin/smoke-me/nicholas/RT-118603 > > Wouldn’t a more robust approach like the attached be better? (I have > not actually tested my patch.) > Nicholas's smoke-me branch builds and tests successfully on Darwin/PPC, so it solves the problem originally posted in this RT. Father C, if you would like to test and smoke your patch, please do so. Since IANACP, I can't say which patch is better. But I do want blead to get back to PASS asap so that I can resume my normal work via this machine. Thank you very much. Jim Keenan --- via perlbug: queue: perl5 status: open https://rt.perl.org:443/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=118603Thread Previous | Thread Next