On 06/16/2013 08:18 PM, Father Chrysostomos via RT wrote: > On Sun Jun 16 17:40:05 2013, jkeenan wrote: >> On Mon Jun 10 15:00:45 2013, perl.p5p@rjbs.manxome.org wrote: >>> * Jan Dubois <jand@activestate.com> [2013-06-10T04:07:32] >>>> >>>> Sorry, it was my incomplete reading of perllocale.pod that led me to >>>> believe that only printf() would follow the current locale. After >>>> re-reading it, I find the documentation self-contradictory: >>>> [...] >>> >>> ...and sorry about my reply, to which you're replying, as it was late >>> to the >>> game and you'd already covered this ground. I had not fully caught up >>> in the >>> thread when I wrote it. >> >> >> Is this the same problem as >> https://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=82418 ? > > No, I don’t think so. That one has to do with constant folding, and > whether the number will be stringified at compile time or run time. > Also note that the author of #82418 expects that you don't need a 'use locale' to have locale effects. It is (still) a bug that any of the examples in this ticket output a comma radix character.Thread Previous