On Sat Jun 23 05:30:03 2012, demerphq wrote: > On Mon Jun 18 12:57:33 2012, sprout wrote: > > On Mon Jun 18 10:55:15 2012, demerphq wrote: > > > On 18 June 2012 19:53, yves orton via RT <perlbug-followup@perl.org> > > wrote: > > > > Hrm, this is an unfortunate side effect of how the implementation > of > > > > C< (?|..) > and (?-1) work together. �The \G is actually > irrelevant as > > > > without it the pattern matches at a different place and does not > use (? > > > > -1) to match. > > > > > > > > I had hoped that named captures would solve this problem, but they > > suffer > > > > from the same thing. I will investigate further. > > > > > > I also noticed a weird parse bug if you write the original pattern > > > with (?&1) which needs to be fixed as well. > > > > You mean bug #101666? > > > > Yes, thanks for the pointer. I have now resolved the problem and closed > that ticket. > > cheers, > yves > > > > Yves, can we get an update on the status of *this* RT? Thank you very much. Jim Keenan --- via perlbug: queue: perl5 status: open https://rt.perl.org:443/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=112894Thread Previous