Front page | perl.perl5.porters |
Postings from June 2013
On Tue Jan 31 04:27:52 2012, nicholas wrote: > On Mon, Jan 30, 2012 at 06:40:38PM -0500, Ricardo Signes wrote: > > * Nicholas Clark <perlbug-followup@perl.org> [2012-01-30T12:31:24] > > > > For starters, I think that this section near the top of > perlfunc.pod should > > > go: > > > > Agreed. > > Gone with commit f677dfafdf263271. > > The ticket's more general question remains, about the start of "new". > > Nicholas Clark > Unfortunately, tickets where only "more general questions" remain too often lack criteria for being closed. The postings that followed in this RT thread mostly constituted a policy discussion of the kind better conducted on the mailing list. I recommend that those who posted to this thread last year review their postings and either (a) post policy viewpoints to p5p; and/or (b) create new RT items *with patches*. I am taking this ticket for the purpose of closing it in 7 days unless someone wants to set off a new round of bikeshedding ;-) . Thank you very much. Jim Keenan --- via perlbug: queue: perl5 status: open https://rt.perl.org:443/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=109408Thread Next