develooper Front page | perl.perl5.porters | Postings from June 2013

Re: I made t/podcheck.t less sensitive and fixed various pod issues

Thread Previous | Thread Next
From:
Aristotle Pagaltzis
Date:
June 8, 2013 13:19
Subject:
Re: I made t/podcheck.t less sensitive and fixed various pod issues
Message ID:
20130608131849.GA17054@fernweh.plasmasturm.org
* David Golden <xdg@xdg.me> [2013-06-08 05:15]:
> We have a version control system. Commits are cheap and can be
> reverted. If there is "consensus" to revert, then it can be reverted.
> If not, then it can stay in. It's just the flip side of waiting for
> "consensus" to apply a commit.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Lamest_edit_wars

> If the discussion is about personal preference, then group discussion
> is pretty pointless and the decision ultimately rests with the
> pumpking anyway.

So you asked the pumpking before pushing the commit, then?

> * Ricardo Signes <perl.p5p@rjbs.manxome.org> [2013-06-08 04:15]:
> > I was also unhappy with the way this commit was applied, and had
> > specifically said I wanted prior discussion.
>
> And I replied that I didn't want to do work and then sit around
> waiting for weeks of bikeshed conversation that ultimately isn't about
> merits but is about personal preferences.

Hm.

Thread Previous | Thread Next


nntp.perl.org: Perl Programming lists via nntp and http.
Comments to Ask Bjørn Hansen at ask@perl.org | Group listing | About