Front page | perl.perl5.porters |
Postings from June 2013
* David Golden <xdg@xdg.me> [2013-06-08 05:15]: > We have a version control system. Commits are cheap and can be > reverted. If there is "consensus" to revert, then it can be reverted. > If not, then it can stay in. It's just the flip side of waiting for > "consensus" to apply a commit. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Lamest_edit_wars > If the discussion is about personal preference, then group discussion > is pretty pointless and the decision ultimately rests with the > pumpking anyway. So you asked the pumpking before pushing the commit, then? > * Ricardo Signes <perl.p5p@rjbs.manxome.org> [2013-06-08 04:15]: > > I was also unhappy with the way this commit was applied, and had > > specifically said I wanted prior discussion. > > And I replied that I didn't want to do work and then sit around > waiting for weeks of bikeshed conversation that ultimately isn't about > merits but is about personal preferences. Hm.Thread Previous | Thread Next