Front page | perl.perl5.porters |
Postings from June 2013
* Karl Williamson <public@khwilliamson.com> [2013-06-07T16:41:49] > On 05/23/2013 09:32 PM, David Golden wrote: > >On Thu, May 23, 2013 at 10:44 PM, Karl Williamson > ><public@khwilliamson.com> wrote: > >>I object to this being done without adequate discussion on the list. > >>It's not in keeping as to how this project has operated while I've been > >>involved, and is contrary to how I would want to have a project operate that > >>I contribute to. > > > >Has the code base been made worse? No. In fact I fixed a host of > >actual known pod issues that had been ignored that no one had bothered > >to fix. > > The reason not to commit a likely contentious patch without prior > vetting on p5p, is that it comes across as a power play designed to > get one's way without regard to any merits. I was also unhappy with the way this commit was applied, and had specifically said I wanted prior discussion. If everybody else wants a development culture in which committers apply whatever they want, rather than try to figure out what is best, I could work on my garden instead. -- rjbsThread Previous | Thread Next