Front page | perl.perl5.porters |
Postings from June 2013
On Fri, Jun 7, 2013 at 10:41 PM, Karl Williamson <public@khwilliamson.com> wrote: > The only valid number is 79. It is not 100 nor 90 nor 80. I agree, somewhat reluctantly (given my love-hate relationship with man). As long as we support man as a primary back-end for pod (which I suspect we will forever), we need to do this. And as Nicholas already mentioned, postponing fixing this is not a scalable solution. > But to return to my main point, making commits of likely contentious patches > without prior public p5p discussion is almost guaranteed to hurt the project > overall. Agreed, though probably he didn't consider this contentious when he committed this. LeonThread Previous | Thread Next