Front page | perl.perl5.porters |
Postings from May 2013
On Tuesday, 7 May 2013, Steffen Mueller wrote: > On 05/07/2013 12:21 AM, Ricardo Signes wrote: > >> * demerphq <demerphq@gmail.com> [2013-05-01T10:32:07] >> >>> [pack is a mess] >>> >> >> I would like to address "the pack problem," but am going to avoid wading >> into >> this until 5.18.0 is shipped, as my time has been crunched lately. So >> I'm just >> writing to say, "I care and will write more," that that's all. >> > > That's likely the best choice in the circumstances and I would probably do > the same in your shoes. Not a 5.16=>5.18 regression and we can't let 5.18 > wait for all bugs forever. for sure. i never meant that we should fix for 518. > Nonetheless, if we're going to upgrade to 5.18 at work, I could entirely > see this as being the first case of us not using a pristine upstream perl. > We've been actively trying not to go down that path. > lets hope we dont have to do this yves on ipad -- perl -Mre=debug -e "/just|another|perl|hacker/"Thread Previous | Thread Next