Re: [perl #117613] Problems with Carp::longmess() in 5.17.10 andbefore

On 04/30/2013 11:31 PM, Ricardo Signes wrote:
> 2) some further eyes investigating whether removing line 14 above is 
> actually okay; I'm not sure Ben Tilly is around anymore; last p5p 
> post, 2009? 

he is on boston.pm's list and posted recently. do you want me to notify 
him that you are looking at this?

uri

• Re: [perl #117613] Problems with Carp::longmess() in 5.17.10 andbefore by Michael G. Schwern
• Re: [perl #117613] Problems with Carp::longmess() in 5.17.10 andbefore by Ricardo Signes
• Re: [perl #117613] Problems with Carp::longmess() in 5.17.10 andbefore by Ricardo Signes
• Re: [perl #117613] Problems with Carp::longmess() in 5.17.10 andbefore by Michael G. Schwern
• Re: [perl #117613] Problems with Carp::longmess() in 5.17.10 andbefore by Ricardo Signes
• [perl #117613] Problems with Carp::longmess() in 5.17.10 and before by Ricardo SIGNES via RT
• Re: [perl #117613] Problems with Carp::longmess() in 5.17.10 andbefore by Uri Guttman
• [perl #117613] Problems with Carp::longmess() in 5.17.10 and before by Ricardo SIGNES via RT
• [perl #117613] Problems with Carp::longmess() in 5.17.10 and before by Ricardo SIGNES via RT