Front page | perl.perl5.porters |
Postings from April 2013
On Thu Mar 28 04:09:20 2013, zefram@fysh.org wrote: > Jesse Luehrs wrote: > >This seems unintentional. > > Indeed. The Perl_ck_warner() call in die_unwind() used to happen before > unwinding, so would be affected by the lexical warning state at the die() > site. Now it happens after unwinding, so takes the lexical warning state > at the catching site. I don't have a clear idea of which behaviour is > more correct. I wanted to get on record saying that my attempt to get this patch applied was not (mere) desperation for closing blockers, but also an endorsement that it restores the more correct behavior. -- rjbs --- via perlbug: queue: perl5 status: open https://rt.perl.org:443/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=113794Thread Previous | Thread Next