develooper Front page | perl.perl5.porters | Postings from April 2013

archlib

Thread Next
From:
Ricardo Signes
Date:
April 19, 2013 23:29
Subject:
archlib
Message ID:
20130419232846.GA30745@cancer.codesimply.com
The question came up at Lancaster:  what if we ditched archlib-vs-not?

That is, instead of:

  /Users/rjbs/.perlbrew/libs/17.10@std/lib/perl5/darwin-2level
  /Users/rjbs/.perlbrew/libs/17.10@std/lib/perl5
  /Users/rjbs/perl5/perlbrew/perls/17.10/lib/site_perl/5.17.10/darwin-2level
  /Users/rjbs/perl5/perlbrew/perls/17.10/lib/site_perl/5.17.10
  /Users/rjbs/perl5/perlbrew/perls/17.10/lib/5.17.10/darwin-2level
  /Users/rjbs/perl5/perlbrew/perls/17.10/lib/5.17.10

Became:

  /Users/rjbs/.perlbrew/libs/17.10@std/lib/perl5/darwin-2level
  /Users/rjbs/perl5/perlbrew/perls/17.10/lib/site_perl/5.17.10/darwin-2level
  /Users/rjbs/perl5/perlbrew/perls/17.10/lib/5.17.10/darwin-2level

Yes, this would mean that you can't share the pure perl parts of @INC between
two systems.

I'm curious as to initial reactions.

-- 
rjbs
Thread Next

nntp.perl.org: Perl Programming lists via nntp and http.
Comments to Ask Bjørn Hansen at ask@perl.org | Group listing | About