Front page | perl.perl5.porters |
Postings from April 2013
archlib
Thread Next
From:
Ricardo Signes
Date:
April 19, 2013 23:29
Subject:
archlib
Message ID:
20130419232846.GA30745@cancer.codesimply.com
The question came up at Lancaster: what if we ditched archlib-vs-not?
That is, instead of:
/Users/rjbs/.perlbrew/libs/17.10@std/lib/perl5/darwin-2level
/Users/rjbs/.perlbrew/libs/17.10@std/lib/perl5
/Users/rjbs/perl5/perlbrew/perls/17.10/lib/site_perl/5.17.10/darwin-2level
/Users/rjbs/perl5/perlbrew/perls/17.10/lib/site_perl/5.17.10
/Users/rjbs/perl5/perlbrew/perls/17.10/lib/5.17.10/darwin-2level
/Users/rjbs/perl5/perlbrew/perls/17.10/lib/5.17.10
Became:
/Users/rjbs/.perlbrew/libs/17.10@std/lib/perl5/darwin-2level
/Users/rjbs/perl5/perlbrew/perls/17.10/lib/site_perl/5.17.10/darwin-2level
/Users/rjbs/perl5/perlbrew/perls/17.10/lib/5.17.10/darwin-2level
Yes, this would mean that you can't share the pure perl parts of @INC between
two systems.
I'm curious as to initial reactions.
--
rjbs
Thread Next
-
archlib
by Ricardo Signes