Re: [PATCH] On eliminating external tools from the release process

Am 04.04.2013 20:33, schrieb David Golden:
 >> [...]
>>
>> Optimise the slow parts. This won't be one of them.
>
> It depends.  Don't we copy to a temp directory for making the archive
> file?  If every file is copied with EU::Command as a separate command,
> that means invoking Perl once per copy.  That is going to be very,
> very slow on Windows.

While this is a good point, the patch(es) so far only address changes to 
a program that is run once or twice when cutting a release, and ideally 
not run at all while cutting a release. In that sense, spending time on 
making that program perform faster is wasted in my opinion.

-max

• [PATCH] On eliminating external tools from the release process by Max Maischein
• RE: [PATCH] On eliminating external tools from the release process by vadim.konovalov
• Re: [PATCH] On eliminating external tools from the release process by Nicholas Clark
• RE: [PATCH] On eliminating external tools from the release process by bulk 88
• Re: [PATCH] On eliminating external tools from the release process by Nicholas Clark
• RE: [PATCH] On eliminating external tools from the release process by bulk 88
• Re: [PATCH] On eliminating external tools from the release process by Nicholas Clark
• Re: [PATCH] On eliminating external tools from the release process by David Golden
• Re: [PATCH] On eliminating external tools from the release process by Max Maischein
• Re: [PATCH] On eliminating external tools from the release process by Ricardo Signes
• Re: [PATCH] On eliminating external tools from the release process by Max Maischein
• Re: [PATCH] On eliminating external tools from the release process by Ricardo Signes
• Re: [PATCH] On eliminating external tools from the release process by Nicholas Clark