Front page | perl.perl5.porters |
Postings from March 2013
On Sat, Mar 23, 2013 at 03:33:24PM -0400, George Greer wrote: > On Mon, 18 Mar 2013, Dave Mitchell wrote: > > >On Sun, Mar 17, 2013 at 04:38:00PM -0400, George Greer wrote: > >>O O O X X X -Duseithreads -Accflags=-DPERL_OLD_COPY_ON_WRITE > > > >I wonder if there's any point in smoking PERL_OLD_COPY_ON_WRITE > >any more? I presume it been superseded for all practical purposes by > >PERL_NEW_COPY_ON_WRITE? > > > >Instead, while PERL_NEW_COPY_ON_WRITE is temporarily not the default > >(till after 5.18), perhaps we should smoke that as an option instead? > > > >(The OLD has a couple of consistent failures, which I suspect no one will > >be in a hurry to fix). > > I switch over to _NEW_ and still some failures: > > clang: > http://www.mail-archive.com/daily-build-reports@perl.org/msg135696.html > > g++: > http://www.mail-archive.com/daily-build-reports@perl.org/msg135685.html Thanks for the links. I've just pushed some commits which hopefully fix the Peek.t failure, and add more instrumentation to require.t so it may be clearer why its failing. -- That he said that that that that is is is debatable, is debatable.Thread Previous | Thread Next