On Fri, Mar 8, 2013 at 1:55 PM, Peter Rabbitson <rabbit-p5p@rabbit.us> wrote: > > So my point of view at the time was (and still kinda is): "Anyone with > basic C chops knows what the underlying issue is, but refuses to fix it > for "unsupported perls" on principle, and instead the remaining folks > rather piss about with working around this in the tests". I haven't had tuits to review how the tests were split out, but despite the missing symbol issue, they *were* broken and would fail for anyone who installed Data::Dumper without a compiler available. Jim's efforts to address that weren't useless. We had *two* bugs that needed fixing. David. -- David Golden <xdg@xdg.me> Take back your inbox! → http://www.bunchmail.com/ Twitter/IRC: @xdgThread Previous | Thread Next