Front page | perl.perl5.porters |
Postings from March 2013
On Fri, Mar 8, 2013 at 2:08 PM, Karl Williamson <public@khwilliamson.com> wrote: > On 03/08/2013 05:55 AM, James E Keenan via RT wrote: >> >> On Thu Mar 07 21:57:05 2013, public@khwilliamson.com wrote: >> >>>> >>> >>> I think it would be slightly preferable to not revert the isWORDCHAR >>> patch, but to define it in older Perls to be isALNUM. >>> >> >> I myself would not know how to do that. Could you supply a patch? >> >> Thank you very much. >> Jim Keenan >> >> >> >> --- >> via perlbug: queue: perl5 status: open >> https://rt.perl.org:443/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=116961 >> > > Shouldn't isWORDCHAR(c)'s definition be (isALNUM(c) || *(c) == '_')?Thread Previous | Thread Next