Front page | perl.perl5.porters |
Postings from March 2013
On Thu, Mar 7, 2013 at 6:43 AM, Peter Rabbitson <rabbit-p5p@rabbit.us> wrote: > This is not an ivory-tower nice-to-have - after all there is code in the > wild (and probably even on CPAN) which uses D::D as a poor man's Sereal > or some-such. Telling them "you need to upgrade this module, oh and btw > your serialization code is now 100x slower" is... I can't find the right > expletive ;) Should we reconsider having a pure perl version at all? Then someone who tries to upgrade without a compiler just gets "BOOM" instead of something that works but is 100x slower. David -- David Golden <xdg@xdg.me> Take back your inbox! → http://www.bunchmail.com/ Twitter/IRC: @xdgThread Previous | Thread Next