Front page | perl.perl5.porters |
Postings from March 2013
On Sun, Feb 24, 2013 at 09:53:03PM -0500, Ricardo Signes wrote: > * demerphq <demerphq@gmail.com> [2013-02-24T00:53:55] > > Good catch. I actually wonder at the wisdom of this at all. Having the > > warnings be on a different channel than the data means you dont know > > which item being benchmarked is responsible for the warning as the two > > handles can get out of sync due to buffering. > > I think if that's the case, we might want to improve the warning message to > make it clearer, rather than put the warnings on the standard output stream. > > I also wonder whether some of the tests that are emitting these warnings are > emitting them with good reason. That is: are they actually testing timings > badly? I have not yet investigated. I've reverted the change for now with commit a2656c4ab81b216a427d1e0db6a3aa25b4350ba8. Presumably we can re-address this issue post-5.18. -- Lear: Dost thou call me fool, boy? Fool: All thy other titles thou hast given away; that thou wast born with.Thread Previous