Front page | perl.perl5.porters |
Postings from February 2013
On Wed Feb 27 02:03:54 2013, dolmen wrote: > Look like I did run the test with the system perl (5.12.4) instead of > our custom-built 5.10.1. Anyway, the bug still applies. > > Here is the result of the build with 5.10.1 (corresponding to the perl > with which perlbug ran). > I confirmed this comparing 5.14.0 and 5.16.0. Here is the output on each version of two representative tests: $ /usr/local/bin/perl5.14.0 -Iblib/lib t/bless.t 1..11 ok 1 - use Data::Dumper; Undefined subroutine &Data::Dumper::Dumpxs called at blib/lib/Data/Dumper.pm line 222. # Looks like you planned 11 tests but ran 1. # Looks like your test exited with 255 just after 1. $ /usr/local/bin/perl5.14.0 -Iblib/lib t/indent.t 1..10 ok 1 - absence of Indent is same as Indent() ok 2 - absence of Indent is same as Indent(undef) ok 3 - absence of Indent is different from Indent(0) ok 4 - Indent(0) is different from Indent(1) ok 5 - Indent(0) is more compact than Indent(1) ok 6 - absence of Indent is same as Indent(2), i.e., 2 is default ok 7 - Indent(1) is more compact than Indent(2) ok 8 - On arrays, Indent(2) is different from Indent(3) not ok 9 - Indent(3) annotates array elements with their indices # Failed test 'Indent(3) annotates array elements with their indices' # at t/indent.t line 96. # '$VAR1 = [ # #0 # 'foo', # #1 # 42 # ]; # ' # doesn't match '(?^s:\#0.+'foo'.+\#1.+'42')' ok 10 - Indent(3) runs 2 lines longer than Indent(2) # Looks like you failed 1 test of 10. # 5.16.0 is my default perl $ /usr/local/bin/perl5.16.0 -Iblib/lib t/bless.t 1..11 ok 1 - use Data::Dumper; ok 2 - package name in bless is escaped if needed ok 3 - eval reverts dump ok 4 - package name in bless is escaped if needed ok 5 - eval reverts dump ok 6 - We can dump blessed qr//'s properly ok 7 - package name in bless is escaped if needed ok 8 - eval reverts dump ok 9 - package name in bless is escaped if needed ok 10 - eval reverts dump ok 11 - We can dump blessed qr//'s properly $ /usr/local/bin/perl5.16.0 -Iblib/lib t/indent.t 1..10 ok 1 - absence of Indent is same as Indent() ok 2 - absence of Indent is same as Indent(undef) ok 3 - absence of Indent is different from Indent(0) ok 4 - Indent(0) is different from Indent(1) ok 5 - Indent(0) is more compact than Indent(1) ok 6 - absence of Indent is same as Indent(2), i.e., 2 is default ok 7 - Indent(1) is more compact than Indent(2) ok 8 - On arrays, Indent(2) is different from Indent(3) ok 9 - Indent(3) annotates array elements with their indices ok 10 - Indent(3) runs 2 lines longer than Indent(2) I don't yet have a diagnosis. --- via perlbug: queue: perl5 status: new https://rt.perl.org:443/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=116961Thread Previous | Thread Next