On Fri Sep 26 05:22:53 2008, doughera wrote: > On Fri, 26 Sep 2008, H.Merijn Brand wrote: > > > On Thu, 25 Sep 2008 10:02:51 -0700, Nathan Reed (via RT) > > <perlbug-followup@perl.org> wrote: > > > > > To whom it may concern, > > > After running the Configure step and verifying that the > > > config.sh file had the appropriate information for the make step, I > > > ran the make step. I am getting the following error: > > > : > > > gcc -L/usr/local/lib -L/usr/local/BerkeleyDB.4.2/lib -o miniperl \ > > > `echo gv.o toke.o perly.o op.o pad.o regcomp.o dump.o util.o > > > mg.o reentr.o mro.o hv.o av.o perl.o run.o pp_hot.o sv.o pp.o scope.o > > > pp_ctl.o pp_sys.o doop.o doio.o regexec.o utf8.o taint.o deb.o > > > universal.o xsutils.o globals.o perlio.o perlapi.o numeric.o > > > mathoms.o locale.o pp_pack.o pp_sort.o | sed 's/ op.o / /'` \ > > > miniperlmain.o opmini.o > > > Undefined first referenced > > > symbol in file > > > cos pp.o > > > exp pp.o > > > log pp.o > > > pow pp.o > > > sin pp.o > > > ceil pp.o > > > fmod pp.o > > > sqrt pp.o > > > atan2 pp.o > > > floor pp.o > > > > You're missing the math library, not the include file. How did it not > > find libm.a/libm.so/libm.sl? > > > So, you're building for a 32bit perl, and you have chosen to answer the > > questions, instead of choosing the default answers (I see no -de option) > > Yes, that's what happened. It's a reasonable thing to do, but for some > reason it's also a common thing for users to delete the list of > directories to search for libraries. > > > > libpth=/usr/local/lib /usr/ccs/lib > > > So my guess is that you have entered '/usr/local/lib /usr/ccs/lib' > > where Configure came with a much longer list of path elements, and > > doing it that way, you've removed the default list. > > Yes. That's the culprit. It's missing /usr/lib at the very least. > > To fix this, you need to start at the very beginning all over again. See > the section > > =item Missing functions and Undefined symbols > > in the INSTALL file for more information. > H.Merijn Brand and Andy Dougherty appear to have given reasonable responses to the original poster's problem, which appears to have been at least partially self-induced. I am therefore marking this ticket resolved. Thank you very much. Jim Keenan --- via perlbug: queue: perl5 status: open https://rt.perl.org:443/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=59332