develooper Front page | perl.perl5.porters | Postings from February 2013

Is there any reason not to remove the experimental designation for\N ?

Thread Next
From:
Karl Williamson
Date:
February 24, 2013 22:29
Subject:
Is there any reason not to remove the experimental designation for\N ?
Message ID:
512A9441.5080200@khwilliamson.com
\N meaning the inverse of \n in patterns has been out since 5.12.  Since 
5.14, AFAICR there have been no bugs reported nor any complaints about 
it.  It seems to me time, in 5.18, after 3 major releases to stop 
calling it experimental.

Why would we not want to do this?

Thread Next


nntp.perl.org: Perl Programming lists via nntp and http.
Comments to Ask Bjørn Hansen at ask@perl.org | Group listing | About