develooper Front page | perl.perl5.porters | Postings from February 2013

RE: Perl 7 or Perl 2013?

Thread Previous | Thread Next
From:
Steve Hay
Date:
February 7, 2013 11:16
Subject:
RE: Perl 7 or Perl 2013?
Message ID:
67B2BB40A61BE846B65EF4793B863D6C3FDFB4@ukmail02.planit.group
Nicholas Clark wrote on 2013-02-07:
> The version number isn't the only perceived marketing frustration.
> People also express a lot of frustration that the modules they
> consider that should be in a distribution aren't in the distribution.
> 
> Wouldn't one solution to this whole name/number/stuff conundrum be to
> take (say) Chocolate Perl, or some other "batteries included"
aggregate
> distribution and promote *that*? Its version number doesn't have to be
> tied either to 5 or to 18.
> 
> Perl doesn't ship with a decent object system? Nonsense, Chocolate
> Perl does.
> etc
> 

Sounds like ActivePerl and Strawberry Perl...

Thread Previous | Thread Next


nntp.perl.org: Perl Programming lists via nntp and http.
Comments to Ask Bjørn Hansen at ask@perl.org | Group listing | About