develooper Front page | perl.perl5.porters | Postings from February 2013

RE: Perl 7 or Perl 2013?

Thread Previous | Thread Next
Steve Hay
February 7, 2013 11:16
RE: Perl 7 or Perl 2013?
Message ID:
Nicholas Clark wrote on 2013-02-07:
> The version number isn't the only perceived marketing frustration.
> People also express a lot of frustration that the modules they
> consider that should be in a distribution aren't in the distribution.
> Wouldn't one solution to this whole name/number/stuff conundrum be to
> take (say) Chocolate Perl, or some other "batteries included"
> distribution and promote *that*? Its version number doesn't have to be
> tied either to 5 or to 18.
> Perl doesn't ship with a decent object system? Nonsense, Chocolate
> Perl does.
> etc

Sounds like ActivePerl and Strawberry Perl...

Thread Previous | Thread Next Perl Programming lists via nntp and http.
Comments to Ask Bjørn Hansen at | Group listing | About