develooper Front page | perl.perl5.porters | Postings from February 2013

Re: Perl 7 or Perl 2013?

Thread Previous | Thread Next
From:
Eric Brine
Date:
February 6, 2013 19:08
Subject:
Re: Perl 7 or Perl 2013?
Message ID:
CALJW-qHdMWX4--xgHyc5N6s_BG6GPGE-ntvNRds0n=L=CnA_RQ@mail.gmail.com
On Wed, Feb 6, 2013 at 11:07 AM, demerphq <demerphq@gmail.com> wrote:

> On 6 February 2013 16:40, Peter Rabbitson <rabbit-p5p@rabbit.us> wrote:
> > The 20xx sounds too much like a bad 80's movie to me :) Let's stick with
> > P5 v20.0
>
> I think this is a sane solution. Make it clear that Perl 5.14.2 is
> actually Perl5 v14.2, which for all intents and purposes is the case.
>

It's not even a change since 14 is called the version internally. So if
anyone asks, we can just say "We didn't change anything; the formatting of
the version numbers was simply confusing people."

So is it C<<use 18;>> or  C<<use 5.018;>> (or both)?

Thread Previous | Thread Next


nntp.perl.org: Perl Programming lists via nntp and http.
Comments to Ask Bjørn Hansen at ask@perl.org | Group listing | About