develooper Front page | perl.perl5.porters | Postings from February 2013

Re: perlopentut modernization

Thread Previous | Thread Next
From:
Peter Rabbitson
Date:
February 6, 2013 18:36
Subject:
Re: perlopentut modernization
Message ID:
20130206183610.GA17190@rabbit.us
On Wed, Feb 06, 2013 at 07:22:18PM +0100, Konovalov, Vadim (Vadim)** CTR ** wrote:
> > From: Rob Dixon [mailto:rob.dixon@gmx.com] 
> > On 06/02/2013 12:57, Paul Johnson wrote:
> > > I agree, but I suspect there is also value in the perl (hah!) core
> > > following its own recommendations as closely as possible.
> > 
> > The Linux Journal has an interview with Larry, who says this
> > 
> >    In Perl's case, we realized about the time of Perl 4 that it was
> >    useful to distinguish between “perl” the program and “Perl” the
> >    language. If you find a first edition of the Camel Book,
> >    you'll see that the title was Programming perl, with a small “p”.
> >    Nowadays, the title is Programming Perl.
> 
> English language has habit of title-casing book names,
> my native language grammatic is different, hence different habits.
> 
> > 
> > http://www.linuxjournal.com/article/3394
> 
> according to this article,
> it appears that before perl4 perl was "perl" and not "Perl"...
> 
> So this is how the language was called before The-Great-Rename event! :)
> 
> 
> > 
> > Vadim is entitled to mis-spell anything he likes, but it doesn't make
> > it correct!
> 
> its not a mis-spell, its just following different rules.
> TIMTOWTDI

BSCINABT. Your point being?

Thread Previous | Thread Next


nntp.perl.org: Perl Programming lists via nntp and http.
Comments to Ask Bjørn Hansen at ask@perl.org | Group listing | About