Front page | perl.perl5.porters |
Postings from February 2013
On Tue, Feb 5, 2013 at 9:07 PM, Leon Timmermans <fawaka@gmail.com> wrote: > Why would you want to do this in the first place? It's slightly worse than that. If you close STDIN and then your program requires a module, the handle for loading it will wind up on fd 0, too. Capture::Tiny goes through some hoops to avoid that, but it would be nice if the core could find a way to stay off fd 0 (assuming a sufficiently portable way to do so exists). David -- David Golden <xdg@xdg.me> Take back your inbox! → http://www.bunchmail.com/ Twitter/IRC: @xdgThread Previous | Thread Next