Front page | perl.perl5.porters |
Postings from February 2013
Re: Perl 7 or Perl 2013?
Thread Previous
|
Thread Next
From:
Karl Williamson
Date:
February 6, 2013 16:15
Subject:
Re: Perl 7 or Perl 2013?
Message ID:
5112817C.6080601@khwilliamson.com
On 02/06/2013 08:56 AM, Alberto Simões wrote:
>
>
> On 06/02/13 15:40, Peter Rabbitson wrote:
>> On Wed, Feb 06, 2013 at 04:22:17PM +0100, Ovid wrote:
>>> Hi all,
>>>
>>> No worries: I have my asbestos undies on for responses to this post:
>>> http://blogs.perl.org/users/ovid/2013/02/perl-7.html
>>>
>>> In that I asked about the pros and cons of renaming Perl 5 to Perl 7.
>>> Toby
>>> Inkster suggested Perl 2013 (and so on).
>>
>> The 20xx sounds too much like a bad 80's movie to me :) Let's stick with
>> P5 v20.0
>
> +1
> ambs
>
How about Perl NT ?
or "Perl, now with enzymes" ?
Thread Previous
|
Thread Next