develooper Front page | perl.perl5.porters | Postings from February 2013

Re: Perl 7 or Perl 2013?

Thread Previous | Thread Next
From:
demerphq
Date:
February 6, 2013 16:07
Subject:
Re: Perl 7 or Perl 2013?
Message ID:
CANgJU+XvF080iEpLpBLtH1SJXhxhe7teULqamRLPw+bvMvk6fg@mail.gmail.com
On 6 February 2013 16:40, Peter Rabbitson <rabbit-p5p@rabbit.us> wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 06, 2013 at 04:22:17PM +0100, Ovid wrote:
>> Hi all,
>>
>> No worries: I have my asbestos undies on for responses to this post:
>> http://blogs.perl.org/users/ovid/2013/02/perl-7.html
>>
>> In that I asked about the pros and cons of renaming Perl 5 to Perl 7. Toby
>> Inkster suggested Perl 2013 (and so on).
>
> The 20xx sounds too much like a bad 80's movie to me :) Let's stick with
> P5 v20.0

I think this is a sane solution. Make it clear that Perl 5.14.2 is
actually Perl5 v14.2, which for all intents and purposes is the case.

cheers
Yves



-- 
perl -Mre=debug -e "/just|another|perl|hacker/"

Thread Previous | Thread Next


nntp.perl.org: Perl Programming lists via nntp and http.
Comments to Ask Bjørn Hansen at ask@perl.org | Group listing | About