On Sun Jan 27 17:09:12 2013, jkeenan wrote: > On Tue Mar 27 19:06:12 2012, fergal wrote: > > I haven't done any serious perl for years. I'll see if I can find this > > but it's unlikely, > > > > F > > > > On 28 March 2012 11:00, James E Keenan via RT <perlbug- > > followup@perl.org> wrote: > > > On Wed Feb 23 10:31:58 2005, fergal wrote: > > >> Correct patch attached and the tests pass. > > >> > > > [snip] > > >> > > >> Simple reason, it's easier to debug and fix the Perl code. I'll do > > the XS > > >> stuff later if the Perl fix is accepted, > > >> > > >> F > > >> > > > > > > F, > > > > > > In RT I only see the original patch; I don't see a second one. �If > > this > > > is still a live issue, could you re-submit the corrected patch? > > > > > > Thank you very much. > > > Jim Keenan > > > > > > > Since we haven't received the second patch, and since demerphq suggested > what appears to be a reasonable workaround eight years ago, I propose > that we close this ticket. > > I am taking the ticket for the purpose of doing so in seven days, unless > someone has a way forward with the issues discussed. > Closing as per schedule; marking ticket Rejected. Thank you very much. Jim Keenan --- via perlbug: queue: perl5 status: open https://rt.perl.org:443/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=34230Thread Previous