[perl #72710] perl.pod description of perl is horribly dated

On Sun Mar 25 12:15:59 2012, jkeenan wrote:
> On Sun Jan 15 19:25:51 2012, rjbs wrote:
> > I agree that perl.pod deserves more work, still.  It reads too much
> > like a superbrief summary of
> > perl500delta.  I'll have go at something in a branch.
> 
> Have you created that branch?

Check out http://perl5.git.perl.org/perl.git/commitdiff/3a15abda70a53173e8b39f73f1000bc52 

-- 
rjbs

---
via perlbug:  queue: perl5 status: open
https://rt.perl.org:443/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=72710

• [perl #72710] perl.pod description of perl is horribly dated by Ricardo SIGNES via RT
• [perl #72710] perl.pod description of perl is horribly dated by James E Keenan via RT
• [perl #72710] perl.pod description of perl is horribly dated by Ricardo SIGNES via RT
• [perl #72710] perl.pod description of perl is horribly dated by James E Keenan via RT
• Re: [perl #72710] perl.pod description of perl is horribly dated by Ricardo Signes
• Re: [perl #72710] perl.pod description of perl is horribly dated by Andy Dougherty