Front page | perl.perl5.porters |
Postings from January 2013
On Tue Mar 27 19:06:12 2012, fergal wrote: > I haven't done any serious perl for years. I'll see if I can find this > but it's unlikely, > > F > > On 28 March 2012 11:00, James E Keenan via RT <perlbug- > followup@perl.org> wrote: > > On Wed Feb 23 10:31:58 2005, fergal wrote: > >> Correct patch attached and the tests pass. > >> > > [snip] > >> > >> Simple reason, it's easier to debug and fix the Perl code. I'll do > the XS > >> stuff later if the Perl fix is accepted, > >> > >> F > >> > > > > F, > > > > In RT I only see the original patch; I don't see a second one. �If > this > > is still a live issue, could you re-submit the corrected patch? > > > > Thank you very much. > > Jim Keenan > > > Since we haven't received the second patch, and since demerphq suggested what appears to be a reasonable workaround eight years ago, I propose that we close this ticket. I am taking the ticket for the purpose of doing so in seven days, unless someone has a way forward with the issues discussed. Thank you very much. Jim Keenan --- via perlbug: queue: perl5 status: open https://rt.perl.org:443/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=34230Thread Next