Re: [perl #116543] [PATCH] Clean up warnings in toke.c

On Fri, Jan 25, 2013 at 12:21:23PM -0800, Karl Williamson via RT wrote:
> Thanks, applied as e5cc0c0f6882f57240eff796b0262dd05e8e8d88

Yes, this is the right thing to do, consistent with our "tradition" of
working round the foibles of compilers.

I'd just like to express a rant here about gcc - the highly variable
variables that it has decided that it can't check to see if they contain
*printf formatting code are:

static const char* const ident_too_long = "Identifier too long";

and

    static const char* const number_too_long = "Number too long";


Like those are going to change ever. :-(

Here endeth the minor rant about gcc.

Nicholas Clark

• [perl #116543] [PATCH] Clean up warnings in toke.c by Karl Williamson via RT
• Re: [perl #116543] [PATCH] Clean up warnings in toke.c by Nicholas Clark
• Re: [perl #116543] [PATCH] Clean up warnings in toke.c by Peter Martini