Front page | perl.perl5.porters |
Postings from January 2013
On Thu, Jan 24, 2013 at 4:35 AM, Dave Rolsky <autarch@urth.org> wrote: > On Wed, 23 Jan 2013, James E Keenan wrote: > > On 1/23/13 7:05 PM, Alexander Hartmaier wrote: >> >>> As my work environment seems to be too new for what perlhack suggests ( >>> http://mail.google.com is my mail client) I wasn't able to use perlbug >>> to >>> submit the patch so I've simply attached it instead. >>> >>> Good night, Alex >>> >>> >> Based on my first read-through of the patch, I say: Apply it. >> >> There are a few hard-tabs that could be converted to whitespace, and >> there are a few places where the copy-editor in me would like to improve >> the flow a bit, but as they say in Hollywood, "We can take care of that in >> post-." >> >> Dave Rolsky: What do you think? >> > > On #p5p today there was some discussion on doing a bigger rewrite based on > Leon Timmerman's outline here - https://github.com/Leont/** > perlopentut/blob/master/**perlopentut.pod<https://github.com/Leont/perlopentut/blob/master/perlopentut.pod> > > Alex expressed interest in working on that. If that's still the case I'd > just as soon wait for that. Yes, that's still the case if time permits it! As the new tutorial will be a ~90% line-change I suggest to apply the current patch first to still have better docs in case I'm not able to finish the rewrite (refactor? ;-) until 5.18.0 gets released. If you agree I'll try to send patch version #2 with Vadim's suggestions in the next few days. > > > -dave > > /*============================**==============================**== > http://VegGuide.org http://blog.urth.org > Your guide to all that's veg House Absolute(ly Pointless) > ==============================**==============================***/ >Thread Previous | Thread Next