On Wed Sep 19 06:06:13 2007, shay wrote: > dk@tetsuo.karasik.eu.org (via RT) wrote: > > # New Ticket Created by dk@tetsuo.karasik.eu.org > > # Please include the string: [perl #45495] > > # in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue. > > # <URL: http://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=45495 > > [...] > > but possibly , if I'm not mistaken, the default notion of PerlIO=FILE > > is > > obsolete, so the removal of the whole if-endif block will probably be > > even > > better. > > Which if-endif block are you referring to there? > > Defining PERLIO_LAYERS 1 doesn't feel right if we're not using the > PerlIO implementation, but I'm not really sure. Removing obsolete code > sounds better, but I also don't know whether it really is dead or not. > Anyone know? > Still a problem in 5.17.6, attaching a diff of post processor of win32.c and pp_hot.c. Yes the interp struct definitions are different. -- bulk88 ~ bulk88 at hotmail.com --- via perlbug: queue: perl5 status: open https://rt.perl.org:443/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=45495