On Mon, Dec 10, 2012 at 3:08 PM, Alexander Hartmaier <alex.hartmaier@gmail.com> wrote: > I wonder why the author has the impression "While the Perl community is > interested in improving the language, the focus on security has historically > tended to take a back seat to other priorities, such as new features and > improved performance."? > Looking at the taint mode and hash alglorith discussions I'd say that p5p is > very concerned about keeping security related features alive and fixing > security related bugs asap. > Can someone try to contact the author to discuss his opinion before it > spreads? Yeah, that sounds like a good idea. LeonThread Previous