Front page | perl.perl5.porters |
Postings from November 2012
On 11/20/2012 8:08 PM, James E Keenan via RT wrote: > On Tue Nov 20 05:09:29 2012, jkeen@verizon.net wrote: >> >> I don't think we can solve this problem in one fell swoop, but I do >> think we can make some improvements relatively quickly. I therefore >> propose the following as a first step: >> >> * Create a new subdirectory called t/opbasic. >> * Move any t/op/*.t files which do not already use t/test.pl into >> t/opbasic -- i.e., assume that any t/op/t file which already uses >> t/test.pl does so properly. >> * Adjust 'perlhack' and other documentation as needed. >> * Study those files which we have moved to t/opbasic to see whether they >> are, in fact, eligible to use t/test.pl. If so, move them back to t/op >> and convert them. >> > > Here is a list of t/op/*.t files which appear *not* to use t/test.pl: > > ##### > $ ack -lv 'require.+test\.pl' t/op/ > t/op/arith.t > t/op/caller.pl > t/op/closure_test.pl > t/op/cmp.t > t/op/concat.t > t/op/inccode-tie.t > t/op/index_thr.t > t/op/magic_phase.t > t/op/qq.t > t/op/sprintf.t > t/op/substr_thr.t > t/op/svleak.pl > t/op/threads_create.pl > ##### > > There are 179 files in t/op/ which already require t/test.pl. > > It would be great if P5Pers could examine the 13 files listed above for > the purpose of answering the question: Does this file test any features > used by t/test.pl? (If not, then that file can be converted to use > t/test.pl.) > > Thank you very much. > Jim Keenan > > --- > via perlbug: queue: perl5 status: new > https://rt.perl.org:443/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=115838 > It would be good to have a comment in each file that indicates what the features being tested are that prohibit its use of test.plThread Previous | Thread Next