On Mon, 2012-10-29 at 17:38 +1100, Peter Rabbitson wrote: > On Sun, Oct 28, 2012 at 06:21:39PM +0100, Robert Sedlacek wrote: > > Trying to turn the discussion into a "ship half-arsed code so we change" > > vs. "don't ship broken code" feels non-constructive, and a bit > > insulting. > > Trying to dress the discussion as anything *but* precisely how I framed > it is equally if not more insulting. At least to any long-time p5p > reader, given there is ample material (all available publically) to > identify the main undercurrents of this sub-community. I'm sorry you find disagreement with your viewpoint insulting. But that pretty much means discussing it with you is useless, don't you agree? regards, -- Robert 'phaylon' Sedlacek Perl 5 Consultant for Shadowcat Systems Limited - http://shadowcat.co.uk/Thread Previous | Thread Next