On Sun, Oct 28, 2012 at 06:21:39PM +0100, Robert Sedlacek wrote: > Trying to turn the discussion into a "ship half-arsed code so we change" > vs. "don't ship broken code" feels non-constructive, and a bit > insulting. Trying to dress the discussion as anything *but* precisely how I framed it is equally if not more insulting. At least to any long-time p5p reader, given there is ample material (all available publically) to identify the main undercurrents of this sub-community. I guess at this point all we can do is agree to disagree about the way we see the situation. Thoughts? CheersThread Previous | Thread Next