develooper Front page | perl.perl5.porters | Postings from October 2012

Re: Security Issues in perl-5.16.x

Thread Previous | Thread Next
Chip Salzenberg
October 2, 2012 16:11
Re: Security Issues in perl-5.16.x
Message ID:
On Mon, Oct 1, 2012 at 11:56 PM, Aristotle Pagaltzis <> wrote:
> * Chip Salzenberg <> [2012-10-02 07:05]:
>> If you meant only to restrict only strings handed to require and do
>> FILE, I would not fork Perl for that. Of course I would still hold
>> you in derision for demanding it, given its utter uselessness; and
>> I would enthusiastically mock anyone who decided to go along with you.
>> But I wouldn't fork Perl.
> Just because? Or do you have any use for that?

I do have a use.  For the first example off the top of my head, I've
made some spam-fighting software that uses packed IPv4 addresses as
hash keys.  Those have NULs in them for sure.

I truly can't believe this is a question.  Strings can have NULs in
them.  Hash keys are strings...

Thread Previous | Thread Next Perl Programming lists via nntp and http.
Comments to Ask Bjørn Hansen at | Group listing | About