On Sat Sep 29 19:08:16 2012, jkeenan wrote: > On Fri Oct 15 09:32:02 2004, schwern wrote: > > On Thu, 9 Sep 2004 22:47:35 +0100, Dave Mitchell <davem@iabyn.com> wrote: > > > I'm not sure how this can be construed as a bug. In the general > > > case I'd expect 'a'..'zzzzzzz' to generate a large list, since P5 > doesn't > > > have P6's lazy lists. It just so happens that C<for (X..Y)> is > > > special-cased, but I don't see why that should lead to a general > > > expcatation of lazy-listness? > > > > I have high expectations. > > > > Call it a feature request if it makes you feel better. I reported it > > so its in the tracking system if someone wants to take a crack at it. > > > > Schwern, > > Is this still on your wishlist? It’s on *mine*. -- Father Chrysostomos --- via perlbug: queue: perl5 status: open https://rt.perl.org:443/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=30123Thread Previous | Thread Next