develooper Front page | perl.perl5.porters | Postings from September 2012

Re: perl 5.14.2 bug?

Thread Previous | Thread Next
From:
Dominic Hargreaves
Date:
September 8, 2012 12:09
Subject:
Re: perl 5.14.2 bug?
Message ID:
20120908190901.GB4408@urchin.earth.li
On Sat, Apr 14, 2012 at 03:05:42PM +0100, Nicholas Clark wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 04, 2012 at 04:00:46PM +0100, Nicholas Clark wrote:
> > On Wed, Apr 04, 2012 at 03:45:28PM +0100, Nicholas Clark wrote:
> > 
> > 
> > > which looks plausible. I'd guess the question is which of the
> > > C<PERL_ASYNC_CHECK();>s that that commit added isn't actually safe, and
> > > why not. My hunch is that some pattern match variable in the interpreter
> > 
> > I'm now not quite sure it's as binary as that.
> 
> I've pushed the appended commit to a smoke-me branch. It fixes the panic
> testcase for me. I *think* that it's the correct fix. If it is good, it
> should also be considered for inclusion in 5.14.3
> 
> Nicholas Clark
> 
> commit a155d3f9f6244e11e535e96a11fb038d44b8b1aa

[...]

Hello,

(The branch in question appears to be smoke-me/leave-scope-async-check,
although the hash doesn't match).

Do you think that this is still the right thing to do? If so I think
it needs to be included in blead and maint-5.16 before getting
considered for maint-5.14.

Cheers,
Dominic.

-- 
Dominic Hargreaves | http://www.larted.org.uk/~dom/
PGP key 5178E2A5 from the.earth.li (keyserver,web,email)

Thread Previous | Thread Next


nntp.perl.org: Perl Programming lists via nntp and http.
Comments to Ask Bjørn Hansen at ask@perl.org | Group listing | About