On Fri, Aug 31, 2012 at 08:29:48AM -0700, Father Chrysostomos via RT wrote: > I'm also wondering whether it's even worth creating the utf8 cache to > begin with on magical values, as it will be invalidated almost > immediately. It seems that the extra work to facilitate an optimisation > actually slows things down. I'm not sure if any code relies for performance on being able to call it twice on the same string. I thought that pp_substr() did, but actually that's taking advantage of the fact that the call takes two positions to convert. pp_index() calls sv_pos_u2b() and sv_pos_b2c() on the same SV. I'm not sure whether (a) that matters (b) whether they can be condensed into one call. If no op or clearly related code path ends up calling more than one function twice, then it seems to make most sense to avoid actually storing the cache structure on the SV for "active" values (magic and overloading - I think that's all of them). Nicholas ClarkThread Previous | Thread Next