develooper Front page | perl.perl5.porters | Postings from August 2012

Re: fixing smartmatch (again (still))

Thread Previous
From:
Robert Sedlacek
Date:
August 28, 2012 12:18
Subject:
Re: fixing smartmatch (again (still))
Message ID:
1346181473.24122.7.camel@gomorrah
On Tue, 2012-08-28 at 14:43 -0400, Ricardo Signes wrote:
> As Father Chrysostomos suggests, perl does not *need* smartmatch.  Really, it
> doesn't need need features.  My question is, does perl benefit more from this
> fix to smartmatching than it does from simply removing it?  I believe it does.

I agree that it is a benefit. I also think that this minimalistic
approach allows many things to be handled and experimented with on CPAN,
which I'm always glad about.

So, personally, I'd be very happy to have and use the described feature.

regards
-- 
Robert 'phaylon' Sedlacek

Perl 5 Consultant for
Shadowcat Systems Limited - http://shadowcat.co.uk/


Thread Previous


nntp.perl.org: Perl Programming lists via nntp and http.
Comments to Ask Bjørn Hansen at ask@perl.org | Group listing | About