On Tue Jun 23 20:37:15 2009, davidnicol@gmail.com wrote: > On Sat, Jun 20, 2009 at 2:40 PM, Michael G Schwern<schwern@pobox.com> > wrote: > > > > Give the deprecation warnings some teeth. �Make it a straight up > syntax error. > > You realize that making that a syntax error implies editing > t/base/lex.t, right? > > How about acknowledging that after fourteen years on death row without > executing this prisoner it is eligible for parole? I used to used << all the time, and then deprecation warnings became the default, which was annoying. I don’t see what harm it causes to undeprecated <<, since it is totally unambiguous. I’m going to re-open this with the hope that we can undeprecate it. -- Father Chrysostomos --- via perlbug: queue: perl5 status: rejected https://rt.perl.org:443/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=66686