On Mon Jul 09 06:29:12 2012, davem wrote: > On Sun, Jul 08, 2012 at 02:18:36PM -0700, Father Chrysostomos wrote: > > These all fail to parse with bleadperl, but work in 5.16: > [snip] > > /(?{ <<END > > END > > })/; > > Note that the bleadperl change just made literal (?{}) be handled > similarly to how array and hash indexes have always been parsed in > interpolating strings. So this fails, and always has: > > qq[$a{ do { > <<END > foo > END > }}]; This is actually a hard one. This works, and always has: s//<<END /e; blah blah blah END I seem to remember writing code that relies on that, too. These work, too: s/${ <<END }//; blah blah blah END m/${ <<END }/; blah blah blah END "${ <<END }"; noet oteuhhnto e END For consistency with historical behaviour, we would have to make this work: /(?{ <<END })/ oentuh oenuth END -- Father ChrysostomosThread Previous | Thread Next